The footprint hole placement doesn't line up with the 3D model from TE's website here:
So is this a footprint issue or a 3D model issue?
Added 1 month ago.
Our CAD team has reviewed both the 2D and 3D files, and we found out that our land pattern is correct and was designed following the specified MF recommended layout. It looks like that there is an inconsistency between a dimension in the recommended footprint layout and the 3D model that TE has in their site. We sent you some images so you can understand the problem better and in the meantime, we have reached out to TE so they can update their 3D model as soon as possible.